We all know the quote by John Maynard Keynes “I’m a mathematician, not a naturalist“. In the end it is our own behavior, how we think, and how we behave that ultimately makes us feel good or bad. This is why my favorite quote by the late economist John Cochrane is “I’m not a naturalist, I’m a materialist.
It’s not just the quote that makes Cochrane’s quote so good. He’s absolutely right that our behavior, how we feel about whatever it is we are doing, and how we act in response determine our happiness or unhappiness. This is why it’s so important to remember that we are not all good or bad. It’s all a matter of how we decide to behave, and how we perceive what we see.
It is true that we can be both good or bad, and we can act in a way that is good or bad, but the way we choose to behave is one of the biggest determinants of whether or not we are happy or sad. We can choose to walk around, enjoy things, look at the stars, or be a little bitch sometimes, but these same decisions can make us feel good or bad.
If you think of mathematics as being more about the “how” than the “why” you can see that there is a difference between mathematics and science. A mathematician uses the “how” to explain the “why”, but science uses the “why” to explain the “how.” A scientist would say that their job is to explain how things work rather than why they work.
The difference is that mathematics is all about the why. The mathematician is the one who makes sense out of the how, while the scientist is the one who explains the how. Because science is so much about what it means to use a tool to solve a problem, it is very hard to explain the how. That’s why mathematicians are so obsessed with proofs, and it is why scientists can’t seem to give a convincing answer when asked to explain what they do.
It seems like mathematicians and scientists are so obsessed with proofs that they can’t explain it. The reason is that they are in awe of the tools they use to explain what they do. This makes the explanation so obvious that it is hard to believe anyone could be so blind as to not see it. Of course mathematicians and scientists are not all mathematicians and scientists. They are many different people with different degrees of knowledge and experience.
Scientists are people who can manipulate physical objects and the physical world to discover the truth of things. Scientific theories are the building blocks of their work. Mathematics is a set of rules that describe the way things work as you are trying to reach a conclusion.
Kepler was a great mathematician and scientist. He believed in the natural world and how it worked. He even used mathematics to explain how the world worked. He created the epicyclic theory of planets and how they orbit about the sun. He also believed in the idea that a body would not move in a straight line.
Even though he used these mathematical concepts to create his theory of planets, he did not believe in the idea that a body would not move in a straight line. Instead he thought that a body would move in a straight line because that is how the Earth was designed. The epicyclic theory, as it turns out, is one of the main reasons why the Earth orbits the sun. It describes what happens when a body moves as it orbits the sun.
It is possible to explain a body’s motion in a straight line by using a curved path. Kepler used the curved path because it is the most efficient way to describe a body’s movement. The more curved a path is, the more efficient it is, and the faster it moves. This is why we do not see a body moving in a straight line.